Make no mistake that the economy of the US has been broken, in some sense, for a considerable amount of time. The unprecedented down turn that has transpired over the past few years seems as if it is never going away. I am just wondering if the GOP wants to keep it that way, at least through the 2012 elections, if not permanently.
John Boehner spoke about reducing debt by cutting spending and pleaded for tax cuts. Now, when given a chance to approve a tax cut that could help create jobs, Boehner wags his finger "No". I often wonder if that is the only word some on the far right know, "No". I don't recall Boehner ever mentioning any desire to pass bills to create jobs, just asking where they were. Over and over and over again. So in that respect, you can't say he hasn't kept up his word. He never promised to create jobs, just inquire as to their wherabouts. However, to see a republican refuse tax cuts is something on a parallel with Haley' Comet. Every hundred years or so.
Boehner doesn't want to support a bill that will give tax cuts to businesses for creating jobs because he only sees it as a short term solution. With the unemployment rate being what it is and the economy making no strides currently, any solution, short or long term, should be considered progress. But that isn't what Boehner and the GOP want to see. They don't want progress. They don't want jobs created. They don't the economy to recover. They want it to fail and pin it all on Obama.
Since taking over control of the House, there have been no jobs bills passed. There has been a bill delaying regulation on food and gas prices, but nothing to create jobs. Why would we expect Boehner and his constituents to create jobs? They already have them, funded by the tax payers with nice expense accounts and transportation and 5 star accommodations covered on our dime. I have yet to see any member of the GOP decry such spending as wasteful. That's because they don't really care about government spending as a whole( see Bush Adminsistration 2001-2009 for proof), they care about government spending when it doesn't benefit them and their backers. It's okay for John Q. Public to pay these folks salaries and benefits, but let's see to it they get nothing in return.
And that is where we stand: more elected officials talking a big game, getting a big tax payer subsidized salary and doing nothing in return. Now, if you consider blocking bills that could help stimulate the economy and job growth through obstructionism and child-like defiance a return, then you are getting your money's worth.
Left-Wing, Right-Wing, and all In-Between. A place for good conversation about hockey and politics, please feel free to jump in and comment.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(138)
-
▼
June
(31)
- Jagr Comeback Percentage Breakdown
- 2012 GOP Nomination Standings, Week 5
- Pens take blueliner
- NHL 2012 Division Realignment with Winnipeg
- Flyers Explode Roster; Shakeup Hockey World
- Defiance Yielding No Results
- Jagr Comeback Watch, June 22
- Bruins Celebrate Cup Win: $156,679.74 Bar Tab
- NHL Award tonight in Vegas
- Jagr Comeback Watch, June 21st
- Hypocritical Hilarity
- Supreme Court Strikes Down Women of Walmart Class ...
- Jaromir Jagr Comeback?
- The Buc and The Thrash: A Cautionary Tale
- Bruins are Champs
- Bruins force Game 7
- Bruins hold 4-0 lead after two
- Boston comes out swinging
- Raising the Cup
- Do or die for Bruins
- Home-ice advantage key for Canucks in Game 5
- Why the NHL Needs to Keep its Edge
- 2012 GOP Nomination Standings, Week 4
- Bruins tie series in 4-0 victory
- NHL suspends Canucks' Rome
- Bruins rout Canucks, 8-1
- Canucks take 2-0 series lead
- Game 2 is pivitol for Boston
- No punishment for Canucks' Burrows
- Vancouver wins Game 1 on Torres' late goal
- Stanley Cup Finals: Game One
-
▼
June
(31)
No comments:
Post a Comment